Skip Navigation

Correction for Cox, Med Law Rev 1 (2) 232-281.
Medical Law Review 1993 1(3):412; doi:10.1093/medlaw/1.3.412
© 1993 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

ERRATA

In the commentary on R. v. Cox on page 232, the sentence in the first paragraph beginning: "It is relevant that the defendant acted out of the best possible motives ..." should have read: "It is irrelevant that the defendant acted out of the best possible motives, for example, to alleviate the ‘victim's’ unbearable suffering."

In the commentary on Doe v. Cutter Biological, Inc. on page 259, the last sentence in the first paragraph should have read: "From a plaintiff's point of view, perhaps this is fortunate since in America the claims have, on the whole, been unsuccessful.".


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.